faith comes by hearing website

Create your own banner at mybannermaker.com!
Make your own banner at MyBannerMaker.com!

tabs

thanks for the fleas sermon based upon the life of corrie ten boom

featured video feed the homeless

Monday, 22 February 2010

So science has all the answers ???


most of the believers in evolution oppose blackhole theories on the basis that .'' the existence of blackholes in space'' blows quantum and relativity.;;physics and everything science claims to know about nature space and all things about planet earth out of the water. However theyre slowly finding ways to include blackholes into their equations but,only because the evidence of blackholes is becoming a fact.

 .

take this link to, see. 180,000 '' essays '' on how we the human race are the only creatures on earth who can use language to speak to each other . And disputed claims and more '' theories and beliefs as to why our claimed ancester apes '' cant.as yet do likewise.'' .....

'' While it took great minds decades to discover that the world isnt flat, in the bible job, describes the world as a sphere hanging in space

'' richard dawking's that great advocater of evolution who doesnt believe in a god '' but spends a great amount of time and resources to attacking his EXISTENCE'' would'nt be too happy if everyone knew the originale theories of life from top scientists, before darwin came on the scene. '' how`ever having presumed this i can tell you for certain that.'' He and all of his associates. '' will tell you that despite so many hundreds of years `s of studying and proposing their theories''. Both before darwin and the present time '' though they believe in what they say about evolution'' They`ve never seen it with theyre own eyes..But if evolution began by one strand of dna penetrating another which is the most recent proposed theorie being put forward as a fact by the advocaters of that believe . Therefore suggesting once again that we are the result of a freak of nature and nothing more than that .Then i have to beg the question what are the odds of nature providing food for something which only came about by chance and i include food specific'ly for birds into that question as much for something which one part of nature had no clue about.
Giving that birds like humans developed over time according to the evolutionary theorie i e from fish to ape and from dinosaur to flying creatures ???then
Surely that question can only be answered by agree`ing that there must have been some
kind of harmony to life which suggests an intelligence of some kind not a freak of
nature followed by another freak of nature, providing food on trees for things that
where created by an accident whats the odds of that happening ???
Intelligence on the other hand like the intelligence in DNA must have a source.
and evolution cant explain that to our satisfaction no matter how hard it trys..

And as for space and the big bang theory the words,dark matter describes something which cant be seen smelt nor held by hand yet without this dark
matter the whole explanation or maths of quantum physics falls flat and withers away.
And it begs the question that despite dark matter being a major part of the maths or
`the explanation of the universe coming into existence and remaining so in perfect sync they expect us mere mortals to accept its existence despite the fact its a name for something no`one can verify actually exists yet under the same breath they say
beyond doubt theres no god because theres no scientific evidence and the age old question of where did god come from and for an atheist where did the energy that caused the so'called bigbang come from still has to be answered yet and thats one question they prefer not to answer and as for gods arrival we can say by faith we dont have to ask.simply look around you.
But dont take my word for this, go surfing and discover the truth for youre`self.
Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Hi please leave a comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

The god delusion ... religion is the most dangerous threat to society???

Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith -- Dr. Andy Thomson from Kurt Volkan on Vimeo.

How not to be objective in science.. or the pot calling the kettle black

Dark matter a giant leap of faith

The mission statement of the richard dawkings foundation is:
To support scientific education and critical thinking and evidence based understanding of the ''naturel world''
in the quest to overcome religeous fundementalism superstition ..intolerance and human suffering????

One of the many associates ''the atheist foundation of australia
inc..States scientific method is the only rational means to,
understanding reality to question & criticly examing all ideas..
testing them in light of facts leads to discovery of truth...

As there is no scientific evidence for supernaturel beings
the universe the world in which we live in and the evolution of
life,are entirely naturel occurrences.

Dark matter: The stuff of invisibility
so vital to the universe cant be criticly examined, cant be,
scientificly examined measured nor even proven to exist,yet
despite that evidence based fact and that beyond giving it
its name to back up the equation that cosmologists evoutionists and co` so fervently promote the fact of the ,matter ,if youll pardon the pun,what they know about it
cant even be written on a postage stamp beyond theyre
imagination..well so much for evidence based understanding,
least not beyond speculation

Yet that doesnt seem to prevent this outright assault on
what they claim as no evidence of supernaturel,being
religious fundementalism superstition and,as for where it fits
in with intolerence and human suffering and how that relates to christianity is beyond me,but its plain mr dawkings and co
clearly wish to make a quest of overcoming such things.

And personally speaking defending free thinkers protection
of human rights by divisive acts and intolerance,towards
religous people isnt so much defending human rights or free,
thinking as much as it is underminding those things.

Biasness on theyre part towards evolution theyre science,
understanding and promotion of these things by these means
leaves a bitter taste in my mouth and the history of evolution
like second generation christianity in both our past history's
are both as bad and not just fashism but also the original
intended use of the i.q.test which gave licence to doctors etc,
the right to meddle in ordinary peoples lifes under the
claim of stupidity low,sub human and american drs where,
just as eager as nazi drs where to expeiment,so genetics has
an evolutionary past and not a very good one.

As for critical rational thinking , is it really possibe,without
an artists impression or computer graphics ,to prove beyond
a doubt what exactly did happen 4.5 billion yrs ago ,is it.??
not that i subscribe to the theory f billions of yrs by the way

Thats what i want to know..and with respect untill such time
my human rights deserve better respect than mr dawkings
and company have been showing up to now and ever increasing so,since he and those who support his views have
openly launched this quest of theirs..would you not agree..

Well all i can say is, whats evidently clear is to remove ,
religion from schooling as much as from morales in gvt both
in the good ol`usa and elsewhere ,so trust me if anyone believes in freedom and free thinking human rights an so on,
it would be a good idea to know for a fact that these people like mr dawkings know with certainty and beyond a reasonable doubt that theyre science can stand up to scrutiny
and, best to know if they are the best people to represent,
your human rights,and im,goin to be looking at that from,
a scientific point of view in great detail,over time ...watch tis'
space..
Heizenburgs theory of uncertainty principle

Basicly speaking it suggests that there has never been,
empty'ness, no
such thing as nothing'ness and that atoms or matter has
all`ways been in existence and while its made more complex

It boils down to this , that anti matter and matter came,

together and imploded or exploded and on this basis rests the
big`bang theory despite being unable to verify the existence
of anti'matter or the fact that the atoms have al`ways been
its clearly substancial to promote the theorie ,however
i just wonder if one belief isnt being substituted for another
and again strange as it is,if its reasonable to suggest that atoms
have allways been in existence even if the vital ingrediants
cant be seen nor verified ,is it really unsound to say then that..


Perhaps we as believers can be just as certain that god has
allways been as well...


And on a par with cosmology and evolutionistic theorys and
and theyre faith in,that ours is just as possible..???



Please excuse the massive gap between this post and the nxt
perhaps mr dawkings could explain why this txtbox acts

the way it does i cant fathom why it creats more space than

than i need but guess thats why im writing this to fill it .....

Descrimination of atheist's.. by christians..it takes two to tangle

mr dawkings ask whats wrong with a difrent belief or oppinion and theres absolutely nothing wrong yet it doesnt wash when you see richards dawkings mission statement on his website.. giving that he thinks christians oppinions have no place in society. and if you search the video's of this debate and mr dawkings Things that offend him then you`ll see for yourself that throwing genetic research in the mix of things like circumcision of young girls stating that those who oppose g ,research offend him its plain that the ignaramuses. he refers to are christians especially research of human feotuses ...which i thinks offensive the woman arguing against christianity use`s a medical term in respect of empty pews being the cause of christian over reactions etc etc and i dont think the word syndrome is the kind of word your average non, believer would use in everyday langauge so theres an immediate bias to beging with... Atheist's rights are just as important as any other person's rights but evolutionism that comes into conflict with religion and uses genralised arguments under a banner of atheism and claims to be standing up for those who choose not to believe in god spouting disgraceful,actions by certain sections of christian society doesnt do any good for the majority of christian people and even less for atheists agnostic people mr dawkings lumps cosmology in with evolution which most atheistic people say is completly separate. soo im glad he does so because most advocaters of evo tend to claim that as a seperate thing and something thats not relative to them and thats a coput to be honest because without the being able to defend the beggining of creation the bigbang theory how can you know that evo is a fact .

evo v god..god help us

mr dawking offended stemcell,research/atheist no bias or descrimination of any kind???

Open minded or plain ignorent disrespectful..

Science ideology truth... what is truth?? darwinism

Darwinism......atheists believe systems / ideology

Just for the record i dont refute that religion isnt full of ,
extremists be it islamic terorrists,or christian dogmatic people

But all, forms of idelogical belief systems or theorist ideas
can bring extremist views which have nothing , to do with,
evolutionists christianity or even any other ,forms of religion

In fact to take up mr amis's point and mr /proffesser dawkings point , despite theyre claim of no logical path to
insanity or crimes against humanity, they do avoid the fact of
the science of eugenics / genetics which stem from charles darwin theorys and lets not forget that communism and that
brought us stalin was a atheist practicing state ideology and it
sought to destroy christianity in the same way as hitler tried
too destroy the jewish race ..or was that because they where
both hardened vegitarians mr dawkings...???? and are your
views not extreme , while rolling off reasons why we should be
offended which i agree with but slipping stemcell research,
into the equation surely thats not as dire as those other things
you menting un`less you have an interest in that field then i,
can value why you might feel offended by genuine concern
from millions of people christian or otherwise who oppose those who like you see no wrong in treating life as, a playground ..to experiment with....what was that about extreme again .....and protecting human rights by science ???